LLM Content Analysis

Optional feature that uses a vision LLM to understand what's actually happening in your clips. A birthday party scores differently than a parking lot. Face detection can tell you someone's there; an LLM can tell you they're blowing out candles.

Any OpenAI-compatible API

This works with anything that speaks the OpenAI chat completions API:

• mlx-vlm: local on Apple Silicon, no API costs
• Ollama: local, supports vision models like LLaVA
• vLLM: self-hosted, great for NVIDIA GPUs
• Groq: cloud, fast inference
• Any other provider with an OpenAI-compatible endpoint

How it works

1. For each video segment, 1-4 frames are extracted (configurable)
2. Frames are sent to the vision LLM with a prompt asking for content description and interest rating
3. The LLM response is parsed into a score
4. That score is weighted and added to the overall interest score

LLM Title Generation

Instead of generic "TWO WEEKS IN SPAIN, SUMMER 2025" template titles, the app feeds your trip's raw GPS data to a local LLM and gets back something like "Sous les falaises de la Saxe" or "Odyssée a travers l'Ombrie et les Marches". It works in any language and classifies your trip pattern too.

What the LLM gets

After the analysis phase completes, the LLM receives daily GPS clusters: how many photos you took at each location, each day. From that raw data, it figures out the travel pattern (base camp? road trip? hiking trail?) and generates a title + subtitle in your locale. No pre-processing, no clustering algorithm telling it what to think: just the raw photo distribution and the model's own reasoning.

What it produces

• Title and optional subtitle in your configured language
• Trip type: base_camp, multi_base, road_trip, or hiking_trail
• Map mode recommendation for the animated map intro
• A one-line reason explaining why it picked that classification

You see everything in Step 3 of the UI and can edit before rendering. Hit the regenerate button to try again with the same GPS data.

Model recommendations

Qwen3.5-9B-MLX-4bit with thinking disabled is what you want for titles. 5.5GB, 7-17 seconds per title on Apple Silicon, 100% JSON reliability, and genuinely creative multilingual output.

One catch: you MUST disable thinking mode in the omlx admin panel (/admin). Set chat_template_kwargs to {"enable_thinking": false} for the Qwen3.5 model. With thinking enabled, the model burns 2000-8000 tokens on chain-of-thought before it even starts the JSON, and most requests time out.

Model	Size	Speed	Quality	Reliability	Notes
Qwen3.5-9B (no think)	5.5GB	7-17s	Great	100%	Best overall
Qwen3.5-4B (no think)	2.9GB	~10s	Good	~90%	Lighter alternative
Qwen2.5-VL-7B	4.5GB	4-5s	OK	T=0.1 only	Vision model doing text: works but generic
Qwen3.5-9B (thinking ON)	5.5GB	300s+	Great	~30%	Don't. Disable thinking.

Mood Detection for Music

The music pipeline needs a vision LLM to analyze video keyframes and detect mood. Any server that speaks the OpenAI /v1/chat/completions endpoint works: it just needs to handle image inputs.

LLM Setup

mlx-vlm (Recommended on Apple Silicon):

uvx --python 3.12 --from mlx-vlm --with torch --with torchvision \
  mlx_vlm.server --port 8080

Ollama:

ollama pull llava
ollama serve

Cloud APIs (Groq, OpenAI, etc.): any cloud API that supports vision and speaks the OpenAI chat completions format works.

Configuration

Content analysis needs TWO config sections: content_analysis controls the feature itself, and llm tells it which model to talk to.

# Which LLM to use (shared with title generation)
llm:
  base_url: "http://localhost:8000/v1"
  model: "mlx-community/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct-8bit"
  api_key: "not-needed"        # for local models
  provider: "openai"           # openai-compatible API
  timeout_seconds: 300

# Content analysis settings
content_analysis:
  enabled: false               # opt-in, off by default
  weight: 0.35                 # how much LLM score influences final ranking
  analyze_frames: 2            # 1-4 frames analyzed per segment
  min_confidence: 0.5          # ignore scores below this threshold
  frame_max_height: 480        # downscale frames before sending (480=fast, 720=balanced)
  openai_image_detail: low     # low=85 tokens/cheap, high=1889 tokens/detailed

A separate title_llm section can override these for trip title generation (useful if you want a different model for titles vs. content analysis):

title_llm:
  base_url: "http://localhost:11434/v1"
  model: "llama3.2"

Any field not set in title_llm falls back to the llm values.

Weight

The weight parameter (0.0 to 1.0) controls how much the LLM score matters relative to the other scoring factors (faces, motion, stability). At 0.35, it's a meaningful input but won't override a clip that scores well on everything else.

Frames per segment

analyze_frames controls how many frames per segment get sent to the LLM. More frames = better understanding but slower and more expensive. 2 is the sweet spot: one near the start, one near the end.

Frame optimization

frame_max_height downscales frames before sending them. At 480px, API costs are low and most vision models still understand the scene. Bump to 720 or 1080 if your model benefits from detail.

openai_image_detail maps to the OpenAI detail parameter: low uses a fixed 85-token budget per image, high tiles the image for up to 1889 tokens. For clip scoring, low is usually enough.

Cost considerations

If you're using a cloud provider, every segment analyzed costs API calls. A library with 500 video segments at 2 frames each = 1,000 image API calls. Local models (mlx-vlm, Ollama) have zero marginal cost but are slower.

For large libraries, consider running with LLM analysis disabled first, then enabling it for a curated subset.